Home

About the Artist

Paintings

Blog

Workshops

Events

Email Newsletter

Free Gift Certificate - Limited Offer

Contact the Artist

Galleries

The Divine Proportion


Flat Lake Aspens by Keith Bond, 32 x 36

  The Divine Proportion

By

Keith Bond

 I find it interesting how a single number has had such tremendous influence on me that it has opened my mind to a new way of thinking and a new way of seeing the world. I am not alone in this fascination with a number. Throughout history, many have discovered the mysteriousness of the number Phi. 

Recently, I have been reading a book about Phi entitled The Golden Ratio by Mario Livio. A while back, artist Skip Whitcomb turned me on to a study of Phi and encouraged me to consider using it to develop my compositions. Also known as the Golden Ratio, the Divine Proportion, the Golden Section, and the Golden Number, Phi is fascinating in both its unique mathematical properties and its manifestations in countless diverse places. It, along with closely related Fibonacci numbers, can be found in the patterns of a sunflower, the pedal arrangement of the rose, mollusk shells, and in the Milky Way. It is abundantly found in nature. With great aesthetic appeal, many artists, architects, musicians, and others throughout history have used it to their advantage. 

I won’t bore you with a discourse on Phi. If you want to learn about it, check out a few books on the subject. 

However, it has been so enlightening to me that I decided to share with you the growth I am seeing in my artwork. My compositions are becoming stronger and more dynamic as a result of using the ratios inherent with Phi. I now use the Golden Section to determine the placement of the major elements of the composition. I divide up my canvas based Phi. My center of interest in a painting is now placed on the Golden Section or at a derivative of it. I don’t want the work to look mechanical, but rather harmoniously pleasing to the eye. I want the compositions to look natural. 

I used to compose my paintings more intuitively.  I did what ‘felt’ right.  Looking back at older compositions, I find that many are coincidentally close to Phi. Some aren’t. I do realize that this won’t guarantee a stronger painting. It is however another tool I can put in my toolbox. 

So profound are the possibilities that it will likely take a lifetime of study to even partially incorporate them into my artwork. Most of what I have learned still needs to be sifted through. And there is more still to be learned. It is a wonderful road of discovery, experimentation, and artistic growth.

Sincerely,

Keith Bond

PS. As the most irrational of all irrational numbers, I am intrigued by the prevalence of Phi in the natural world. This number, which is farthest of any number from being expressible by a fraction, has qualities which make it far from random. There is order to it. It supports my firm belief that what may appear to our limited, finite minds as chaos is governed by a higher law which we don’t understand. 

Comment on or Share this Article >>

Art is a Language - Part 2

Art is a Language - Part 2

 

Why do some works of art have the ability to bring us to tears while other works go unnoticed?  Why am I drawn to some artworks while you are attracted to others?  What makes truly great art is its ability to communicate on some level with viewers.  For communication to take place, both the artist and the viewer need to engage in the conversation.  Communication is not one sided. The artist needs to have something to say.  The viewer also needs to have something to say.  ‘Listening’ is likewise important in good communication.  I will define listening as an attempt to understand and gain deeper insights through observation and study. 

 

Today we will discuss the viewers’ side of artistic communication.  Next week we will discuss what an artist’s role is in the communication process.

 

First, I would like to illustrate a point.  Let’s try an experiment.  Dear reader, close your eyes. . . ok, now open them (ha, your eyes weren’t closed were they?!).  Actually, read the next paragraph and then close your eyes for a few minutes.

 

Think about your favorite place in the world.  Is it the beach?  Your childhood home?  Your grandparents’ farm?  The park where you fell in love?  Wherever it is, think about that place.  Try to picture it in your mind.  Try to go there for a few minutes. 

 

. . . are your eyes closed?

 

Now that you’ve thought of someplace, I want you to write down a description of the place.  Go on, write.  What does the place look like?  What smells are there?  What colors do you see?  What sounds?  What are you doing?  What season is it?  And most importantly, why do you love that place?

 

Now read what you wrote.  Is there any mention of the number of grass blades or leaves on the trees?  Is there any mention of any superficial detail?  My guess is, ‘No’.  You remember only the essential elements that are tied to your emotional memories of the place.  The reason you love the place is because of fond memories there.  There is certainly some element of emotional attachment. 

 

You are the sum total of all of your experiences.  Take this experiment and multiply it by every experience (good or bad) that you have ever had in your life.  These are the things you (and I) bring to the conversation.  How?

 

If an artist creates a work of art that communicates with you, it has most likely triggered a memory of something you have experienced or has struck a chord with your philosophies or your ideals.  In short, you respond because of the cumulative experiences that have made you who you are.  You don’t need to know exactly how or why a work of art spoke to you.  The artwork may even appear very foreign to your life experiences, but something in the artwork communicated with something within you.  A work of art is incomplete without your side of the dialogue.  You as the viewer complete the communication process. 

 

Now ‘listen’ to the artwork.  The message that you are taking from the artwork is probably not what the artist was saying.  Even if it was close, it would be viewed through your eyes, not the artist’s, and therefore would different (even if only slightly) from the artist’s point of view.  Therefore, if you engage yourself in the process, you can gain deeper insights by listening to what the artist is trying to say.  You may not be able to completely understand the artist’s intentions, but the conversation does not have to end with the first level of communication.  Art has the ability to go much deeper.  Look for it.  There is no right or wrong. 

 

Art is a very complex language, but it is magical.  It does have power to speak deeply.  If a piece speaks to you, engage yourself in the dialogue.  Go deeper.  Listen.  Respond.  It will enrich your life.

 

Best Wishes,

Keith Bond 

Comment on or Share this Article >>

Art is a Language

Art is a Language - Part 1

 

Dear Art Connoisseur,

 

Several years ago, I was in Scottsdale, Arizona visiting art galleries.  There were many paintings which I enjoyed looking at and several that I liked quite a lot.  There were also many paintings that I didn’t care for and some that I down right disliked.  I am sure that there were many that I didn’t even notice.  Of the hundreds, possibly thousands of paintings that I saw on that trip, there is only one that I remember - and it still haunts me.

 

With my first glimpse of that painting, I was captivated.  I stood there across the room just staring.  I couldn’t move if I wanted to - but I didn’t want to.  I felt something.  I felt a profound connection to the scene. 

 

It was not a grand or majestic scene.  It was not one that shouts for attention.  The painting, about 30 x 40 or so, was mostly sky.  Only about an inch or two of the bottom was dedicated to the ground plane - and being in shadow, commanded little attention.  It served only as a reference for scale and place.  The sky, however, was captivating.  A large thunderhead was billowing in the evening sky, illuminated by the sun.  I could almost smell the rain, I could almost feel the wind.  I must have studied that painting for 30 to 40 minutes (both up close and at a distance).

 

It has probably been 6 to 8 years since I saw that painting, but I still remember how it made me feel.  I know that I don’t remember all the details, but I remember the important elements.

 

On another occasion, I discovered a bronze entitled “Sustaining the Prophet” by Ben Hammond.  Again it was not so much the subject, but rather the interpretation and handling of the subject.  It was a biblical story of Moses holding up his arms while the Israelites were at battle.  If he lowered his arms, the Israelites would lose the battle, but while his arms were upheld, they would prevail.  To help sustain him, Aaron and Hur supported his arms.  In the bronze you could feel the tremendous weight and fatigue - the extremely heavy burden.  It was a powerful image.  I have thought of that bronze for several years - hoping to one day acquire one. 

 

I also remember vividly a charcoal drawing by a grad student while I was at Utah State University.  Entitled “The Dirge,” the charcoal was a very powerful depiction of a funeral procession.  You could feel the sorrow and pain.  You could sense the loss and mourning.  Yet the drawing was quite vague - almost dreamlike.  There was little, if any detail.  It was mostly shapes and gestures.  It has been over 10 years since I saw that drawing, but I still remember how it moved me. 

 


Art is a language that can communicate on a deep level with others.  Those pieces which communicated to me may not communicate to others.  Likewise, much of the artwork that I overlook may touch others deeply.  In the next issue of my newsletter, we will explore why and how art speaks to us - and why it may not.  If you have any insights, comments, or questions on this topic, please post a comment.

 

Best Wishes,

Keith Bond

 Copyright, 2007, Keith Bond       

Comment on or Share this Article >>
Artist Websites by FineArtStudioOnline
Mobile Site | iPhone Site | Regular Site